Blogs
Hi, just been invited to this, so go easy and free feel to add me. Ask me anything you want, and hope to get back to you soon. Wishing everyone all the best....
global art
Posted May 31, 2011 by Nelson Arturo Quezada Lopez in Business, Education, Entertainment, Family & Home, Health, Recreation, Shopping, Society, Sports, Technology
hello I have a plastic artist artwork for sale the most important contemporary Latin American artwork. more information apply directly to my personal email nelsonquezada@hotmail.cl
"The only way to help the new republics build free markets is to stimulate private investment. The main magnet is oil."
This advice sounds like it comes from inside Hillary Clinton’s State Department, part of a confidential file set aside for the day when the Jasmine Revolution succeeds in the Middle East. Or perhaps from the notes for president Obama's strategic Middle East speech, delivered May 19. Actually the words were written two decades ago, in reference to Russia and Eastern Europe.
You have to wonder what the author, William Safire, the late New York Times columnist, would have said about Russia today. Safire hoped that a democratic Russia would use its resource wealth and the free market to gain stability and raise the standard of living; eventually, civic institutions would take root. That never really happened: Russia today still has the oil, and some of its citizens sure got the wealth, but its capacity to offer opportunity is far less than the happy minds of 1990 had hoped.
The old Russian revolution offers two lessons for the new Arab Spring. First, don't underestimate the damage natural resources can do. A whole range of scholarship suggests that natural resources tend to impede growth and spur conflicts: Marxists have long warned of the dangers of petro giants, while a newer school of economics, public choice theory, cautions that natural resources encourage rent-seeking at the expense of innovation. Second, democracy and markets aren't enough to secure a prosperous future. To help the Middle East transition, policymakers inside and outside the region must focus on building institutions - courts and schools - more than anything else.
Recall Russia's record. In the early 1990s, the prospects for Russia and some of the new republics around it, oil-rich or not, looked decent. Russians were an educated people who’d been waiting a long time to live independent of dictatorship. Mikhail Gorbachev himself believed that casting off the shackles of "the bureaucratic command system" would permit his society to accumulate wealth sensibly. "We have everything in abundance here: land, oil, gas, coal, precious metals, other natural resources - not to mention the talents and intelligence that God has liberally bestowed on us," he said, expansively.
Foreign governments applauded. Though they liked the idea of privatisation, they were more comfortable with the Russians doing the privatising. Heaven forfend that a Western government or company be accused of colonising. The same held for Russian courts, schools, politics: the unspoken attitude was that to intrude was to assail Russian sovereignty. But leaving Russians to privatise didn’t yield strong democracy or true free markets. Instead, Russians spent most of the next two decades fighting for control of resources, with the government gradually, inexorably, prevailing. The companies the government did not own, it squeezed or seized outright; Gazprom, the natural gas giant, is the prime example.
So how to apply Russia's lessons to the emergent Arab democracies? The easy part is to recognise that states need institutions to avoid a Russia-style free-for-all. Schools, property rights and courts are the most important. Stephen Sestanovich, a Russia expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, e-mailed me a related thought: In his view, Russia’s big problem was the voters’ equation of democracy with disorder. Arabs watching the chaos unfolding in Libya and Yemen would be forgiven for coming to a similar conclusion. "Whether these nations end up with their own kind of Putinism will depend on whether they can also create new institutions that work," Sestanovich wrote.
The next step is more uncomfortable. Those necessary institutions normally take years, even centuries, to build. Middle East democracy doesn’t have that much time. The most efficient way to build institutions is to import international - yes, Western - traditions. A US scholarship program for Middle Eastern high school or college students would give them much to take home and build a country with. To recommend Western institutions to Middle Eastern nations runs against the grain even more than recommending them to Eastern Europe. It sounds colonial.
Yet if dictators go, the new Arab governments may be more interested in the developed world’s models than might have been imagined. Some Middle Eastern nations are already quietly westernising. King Abdullah has created a New England-style boarding school in Jordan to replicate some of what he learned attending Deerfield Academy in Massachusetts. Many Arab reformers have an eye on India, which has prospered since the Cold War precisely because it lacked oil, chose to speak the language of its coloniser and embraced, rather than extirpated, its own colonial institutions.
What’s clear is that the old equation of Resources + Free Markets = Institutions won’t work. In the Middle East, especially, the institutions have to come first.
(Amity Shlaes is a columnist for Bloomberg View and oversees the Echoes blog. The opinions expressed are her own.)
This advice sounds like it comes from inside Hillary Clinton’s State Department, part of a confidential file set aside for the day when the Jasmine Revolution succeeds in the Middle East. Or perhaps from the notes for president Obama's strategic Middle East speech, delivered May 19. Actually the words were written two decades ago, in reference to Russia and Eastern Europe.
You have to wonder what the author, William Safire, the late New York Times columnist, would have said about Russia today. Safire hoped that a democratic Russia would use its resource wealth and the free market to gain stability and raise the standard of living; eventually, civic institutions would take root. That never really happened: Russia today still has the oil, and some of its citizens sure got the wealth, but its capacity to offer opportunity is far less than the happy minds of 1990 had hoped.
The old Russian revolution offers two lessons for the new Arab Spring. First, don't underestimate the damage natural resources can do. A whole range of scholarship suggests that natural resources tend to impede growth and spur conflicts: Marxists have long warned of the dangers of petro giants, while a newer school of economics, public choice theory, cautions that natural resources encourage rent-seeking at the expense of innovation. Second, democracy and markets aren't enough to secure a prosperous future. To help the Middle East transition, policymakers inside and outside the region must focus on building institutions - courts and schools - more than anything else.
Recall Russia's record. In the early 1990s, the prospects for Russia and some of the new republics around it, oil-rich or not, looked decent. Russians were an educated people who’d been waiting a long time to live independent of dictatorship. Mikhail Gorbachev himself believed that casting off the shackles of "the bureaucratic command system" would permit his society to accumulate wealth sensibly. "We have everything in abundance here: land, oil, gas, coal, precious metals, other natural resources - not to mention the talents and intelligence that God has liberally bestowed on us," he said, expansively.
Foreign governments applauded. Though they liked the idea of privatisation, they were more comfortable with the Russians doing the privatising. Heaven forfend that a Western government or company be accused of colonising. The same held for Russian courts, schools, politics: the unspoken attitude was that to intrude was to assail Russian sovereignty. But leaving Russians to privatise didn’t yield strong democracy or true free markets. Instead, Russians spent most of the next two decades fighting for control of resources, with the government gradually, inexorably, prevailing. The companies the government did not own, it squeezed or seized outright; Gazprom, the natural gas giant, is the prime example.
So how to apply Russia's lessons to the emergent Arab democracies? The easy part is to recognise that states need institutions to avoid a Russia-style free-for-all. Schools, property rights and courts are the most important. Stephen Sestanovich, a Russia expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, e-mailed me a related thought: In his view, Russia’s big problem was the voters’ equation of democracy with disorder. Arabs watching the chaos unfolding in Libya and Yemen would be forgiven for coming to a similar conclusion. "Whether these nations end up with their own kind of Putinism will depend on whether they can also create new institutions that work," Sestanovich wrote.
The next step is more uncomfortable. Those necessary institutions normally take years, even centuries, to build. Middle East democracy doesn’t have that much time. The most efficient way to build institutions is to import international - yes, Western - traditions. A US scholarship program for Middle Eastern high school or college students would give them much to take home and build a country with. To recommend Western institutions to Middle Eastern nations runs against the grain even more than recommending them to Eastern Europe. It sounds colonial.
Yet if dictators go, the new Arab governments may be more interested in the developed world’s models than might have been imagined. Some Middle Eastern nations are already quietly westernising. King Abdullah has created a New England-style boarding school in Jordan to replicate some of what he learned attending Deerfield Academy in Massachusetts. Many Arab reformers have an eye on India, which has prospered since the Cold War precisely because it lacked oil, chose to speak the language of its coloniser and embraced, rather than extirpated, its own colonial institutions.
What’s clear is that the old equation of Resources + Free Markets = Institutions won’t work. In the Middle East, especially, the institutions have to come first.
(Amity Shlaes is a columnist for Bloomberg View and oversees the Echoes blog. The opinions expressed are her own.)
Tags:
Arab democracy
May 30, 2011 - Australia's government urged companies on Monday to tighten vigilance over cyber attacks launched offshore against some of the world's biggest resource firms and other businesses, warning high-tech threats were intensifying.
Lockheed Martin Corp , the US government's top information technology provider, raised concern about cyber hacking at the weekend, complaining of a pattern of frequent attacks on it from around the world.
Australian Attorney-General Robert McClelland's comments also came after the outgoing head of Australia's biggest oil and gas company, Woodside Petroleum , said cyber hacking attacks were now coming "from everywhere".
"There is no doubt that cyber-security threats are becoming worse," McClelland told Reuters on the sidelines of a cyber security conference in Canberra.
"Without talking about specific incidents, there have been a number of reports concerning our resource companies," McClelland said.
Outgoing Woodside chief executive Don Voelte told a business conference in Perth on Friday that cyber attacks were a major concern in resource powerhouse Australia, and were not just coming from energy hungry China.
"It comes from everywhere. It comes from eastern Europe; it comes from Russia. Just don't pick on the Chinese; it's everywhere," Voelte was quoted as saying in a report in the Australian newspaper on Monday.
Japanese electronics conglomerate Sony was also hit by a breach involving its PlayStation Network that compromised the personal data of more than 100 million customers.
Australia's parliament came under cyber attack in February, with the computers of at least 10 federal ministers including Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Defence Minister Stephen Smith, targeted and confidential emails possibly accessed.
Chinese intelligence agencies were among a list of foreign hackers suspected of being behind those raids, which followed similar breaches in France concerning computer network information about the Group of 20 wealthy nations.
McClelland said he would not comment on Voelte's assessment of where the attacks were coming from, which came just weeks after the attorney-general and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy met with chief executives from 20 big resource companies, banks and manufacturers to discuss the rising cyber threat.
"We don't comment on the source of those (attacks). It is often literally hard to identify. They are often re-routed through other countries and other providers," McClelland said.
"We think it is better to deal with the threat, to address the vulnerability. It may well be that there is a private corporation involved, that the issue can be addressed without prejudicing their business relations, or their reputation.
Source : Reuters
Lockheed Martin Corp , the US government's top information technology provider, raised concern about cyber hacking at the weekend, complaining of a pattern of frequent attacks on it from around the world.
Australian Attorney-General Robert McClelland's comments also came after the outgoing head of Australia's biggest oil and gas company, Woodside Petroleum , said cyber hacking attacks were now coming "from everywhere".
"There is no doubt that cyber-security threats are becoming worse," McClelland told Reuters on the sidelines of a cyber security conference in Canberra.
"Without talking about specific incidents, there have been a number of reports concerning our resource companies," McClelland said.
Outgoing Woodside chief executive Don Voelte told a business conference in Perth on Friday that cyber attacks were a major concern in resource powerhouse Australia, and were not just coming from energy hungry China.
"It comes from everywhere. It comes from eastern Europe; it comes from Russia. Just don't pick on the Chinese; it's everywhere," Voelte was quoted as saying in a report in the Australian newspaper on Monday.
Japanese electronics conglomerate Sony was also hit by a breach involving its PlayStation Network that compromised the personal data of more than 100 million customers.
Australia's parliament came under cyber attack in February, with the computers of at least 10 federal ministers including Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Defence Minister Stephen Smith, targeted and confidential emails possibly accessed.
Chinese intelligence agencies were among a list of foreign hackers suspected of being behind those raids, which followed similar breaches in France concerning computer network information about the Group of 20 wealthy nations.
McClelland said he would not comment on Voelte's assessment of where the attacks were coming from, which came just weeks after the attorney-general and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy met with chief executives from 20 big resource companies, banks and manufacturers to discuss the rising cyber threat.
"We don't comment on the source of those (attacks). It is often literally hard to identify. They are often re-routed through other countries and other providers," McClelland said.
"We think it is better to deal with the threat, to address the vulnerability. It may well be that there is a private corporation involved, that the issue can be addressed without prejudicing their business relations, or their reputation.
Source : Reuters
Tags:
Cyber attacks
Redirecting Potential Arab Market
Posted May 31, 2011 by Saeed KhanAbbasi in Business, Education, Entertainment, Family & Home, Health, Recreation, Shopping, Society, Sports, Technology, Social media Marketing
Arab Business Club proved a great initiative towards redirecting the potential market capability of Arab world. together from different countries and regions we must provide strength and favor to this initiative.
I am here to provide my international Digital Social Media Branding, B2B networking, Image building and Lobbying services for members of this group for Arab markets and any other markets worldwide.
Saeed Khan Abbasi
Managing Director: Brand Pakistan Blogging
http://www.facebook.com/saeedabasi1
I am here to provide my international Digital Social Media Branding, B2B networking, Image building and Lobbying services for members of this group for Arab markets and any other markets worldwide.
Saeed Khan Abbasi
Managing Director: Brand Pakistan Blogging
http://www.facebook.com/saeedabasi1
Sponsors & Partners
